路飞的师傅:汉译英,高手进

来源:百度文库 编辑:中科新闻网 时间:2024/04/27 04:37:32
作者这里只提到了A的好处,没有说它可能带来的不利影响,这是不公平的,我们应该仔细考虑这个措施的两方面,只有这样比较的结果才另人信服。

谢谢,高手回答。软件闪开!!

The author only mentioned the advantages of A while turned a blind eye to its aderver effects.
It is unfair.We should take both sides of the mesure into account,and only by such comparision can we reach a convincible conclusion.

The writer only mentioned the advantages of A while turned a blind eye to its ill effect.
It is unfair.We should consider both sides of the mesuret,and only by doing such comparision can we make a convincible conclusion.

作者这里只提到了A的好处,没有说它可能带来的不利影响,这是不公平的,我们应该仔细考虑这个措施的两方面,只有这样比较的结果才另人信服。

In this case, the author only talked about the positive factors of A, without mentioning the negative affects. To me, this is very unfair, and I think we should always consider from both sides of something, because people only get convinced by our reasonings.

Authoronly mentioned the A advantage, not said it possibly brings adverse effect, this is unfair, we should carefully consider this measure two aspects, only then compares like this the result only then another person believes.

The author only mention the advantages of A,not mention the bad influences of it , that's not fair. We should consider the measure's two sides carefully,only these results can convince poeple!

The author only mentioned the advantages of A here,didn't talk about the ill influence it may have.That's unfair.We should think about both two sides of the measures carefully.Only in this way,the results of comparison could convince everyone.