中科新闻网徐子崴唱中国之最:英文翻译！！！高手快进啊！！！！
来源：百度文库 编辑：中科新闻网 时间：2024/04/28 14:52:42
Yet, is it conceivable that there really is no difference in the effects of such different treatments in education? How can we sustain the idea that systematically different educational approaches, not during one hour, not a day, or a week, but during four or six full years and thousands of hours of ‘experimental treatment’,will show hardly any measurable differential effect other that student opinion?Think of it this way. Surely students will not become doctors if they are not trained for a number of years. Neither will they become doctors by attending law school.So the curriculum must make a difference. Likewise, studying six days before a test instead of one day will surely improve the chance to pass it. Everybody knows that, and it is a robust finding of experimental studies of learning in psychology labs – the so-called “total time hypothesis” (Cooper and Pantle, 1967). Yet, hours of studying and learning outcome often do not correlate (Van den Hurk et al., 1998).
然而, 是它想得到的那一个那里真的不是教育的如此不同治疗的效果不同? 我们如何能维持主意有系统不同教育的方法, 不在一小时而不是一天期间, 或一个星期, 但是在四或六整数年和数以千计数小时的‘期间实验的治疗',将会给刚刚任何可测量的差别效果看其他的那一个学生意见?这样想到它。 如果他们不被训练若干的数年，当然学生将不成为医生。 他们也将不会成为藉由进入法学院的医生。如此课程一定有差别。 同样地，在六天以前学习一个测试代替一天将会当然改善机会通过它。 每个人都知道，而且它是在心理学实验室–所谓的 " 总时间假设 " 中学习的一个实验研究的强健发现。 (库柏和 Pantle,1967) 然而, 学习而且学习结果的数小时时常不使有相互关系 (货车兽穴 Hurk et al。,1998)。