中科新闻网担保公司担保贷款:麻烦各位大虾给我改改作文, 包括结构方面
来源：百度文库 编辑：中科新闻网 时间：2024/05/03 07:54:42
Supporters of technology say that it solves problems and make life better. Opponents argue that technology creates new problems that may threaten or damage the quality of life. Using one of two examples, discuss these two positions. Which view of technology do you support? Why?
Answer:
Improved technology now affects more and more our daily life. Along with the convenience it brought us, there surely are some disadvantages.
Before 2000, except some big countries, no one can produce a nuclear bomb. But as technology improved, making out a nuclear bomb became easer and become more put in to use to threaten neighbor countries, such as what Korea and Indian did. What more threatening, through the usage of computer and net, terrorism may get what they need to produce a nuclear bomb. If it really comes, our end may come.
Maybe however, we ought to not be that pessimism, after all, the improvement of tech will never stop. Not only because we need better life, but also that the productivity of human beings’ is not improved enough to ensure a continual improvement. People are using fossil fuels. Producing CO2, as well polluting water, killing animals. If the tech level go on like this, we may die out in 300 years. Now, we are more cautious about the environment, starting to produce electric autos and computer cores which may not pollute water. To today’s view, the production with out bad things may cost much, but at least we know what to do. As the tech improves and productivity improves well, balance between human and environment may come.
The disadvantage of tech is sth to be conquered, and it may be conquered by the improvement of tech and betterment of people’s living condition. I always believe that all the problems in the way of the improvement of tech are minor and will never overweigh the importance of improvement of tech.
Answer:
Improved technology now affects more and more our daily life. Along with the convenience it brought us, there surely are some disadvantages.
Before 2000, except some big countries, no one can produce a nuclear bomb. But as technology improved, making out a nuclear bomb became easer and become more put in to use to threaten neighbor countries, such as what Korea and Indian did. What more threatening, through the usage of computer and net, terrorism may get what they need to produce a nuclear bomb. If it really comes, our end may come.
Maybe however, we ought to not be that pessimism, after all, the improvement of tech will never stop. Not only because we need better life, but also that the productivity of human beings’ is not improved enough to ensure a continual improvement. People are using fossil fuels. Producing CO2, as well polluting water, killing animals. If the tech level go on like this, we may die out in 300 years. Now, we are more cautious about the environment, starting to produce electric autos and computer cores which may not pollute water. To today’s view, the production with out bad things may cost much, but at least we know what to do. As the tech improves and productivity improves well, balance between human and environment may come.
The disadvantage of tech is sth to be conquered, and it may be conquered by the improvement of tech and betterment of people’s living condition. I always believe that all the problems in the way of the improvement of tech are minor and will never overweigh the importance of improvement of tech.
这篇文章简直是一窍不通，本小姐懒得再看了，我先闪了哈，剧吓人哦
不错,没啥问题!